ShareThis Page

Legion Post 450 in Sewickley once again at risk for sheriff's sale

| Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

A longtime haven for social life and entertainment for black people in the Sewickley Valley is on the verge of a sheriff's sale for the second time in 14 months.

The Walter Robinson American Legion Post 450 at 20 Chadwick St. is scheduled for sale Monday through the Allegheny County Sheriff‘s Department.

In December 2011, the post filed for bankruptcy after years of declining membership and a down economy, organizers of the post told the Sewickley Herald at the time.

The post once was a local hot spot that attracted many prominent black musicians of the Big Band era, including Ella Fitzgerald, Duke Ellington, Cab Calloway and Count Basie.

It also was widely used by black people for wedding receptions, programs, celebrations and proms during segregation.

The post organized in 1922 after black residents' failed attempts to join Post 4 in Sewickley.

The organization received the old Sewickley Railroad Station — built in 1887 — as a gift from the borough in 1944 after it was moved by railcar from its former location near the corner of what now is Broad Street and Route 65 to its current Chadwick Street location.

The former train station was designated a historic landmark in 1993 by the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation.

Organizers had planned fundraisers throughout 2012 to help offset costs needed to emerge from bankruptcy.

In January 2012, organizers said $125,000 was needed.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.