ShareThis Page

Route 65 corridor improvements ideas sought at public meeting at Sewickley Academy

| Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013, 9:03 p.m.

Improvements could be coming to the Route 65 corridor in Edgeworth and Sewickley and the public is invited to add input.

On Feb. 23, leaders in the two municipalities will host a public workshop focusing on ways to enhance the busy stretch of highway connecting Pittsburgh to New Castle while making its way through the Sewickley Valley along the Ohio River.

The plan began nearly six years ago when a former Edgeworth councilwoman wanted to focus on enhancing the roadway, Edgeworth Manager Marty McDaniel said.

A $10,000 matching grant from the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources allows Sewickley and Edgeworth to work with a consultant to consider everything from small-scale changes such as plant life and greenery to bigger changes such as walking and bike trails and riverfront access, McDaniel said.

“We don't want some idea where they say you should bulldoze everything down and start from scratch,” McDaniel said.

“It's supposed to be a practical thing to enhancing the boulevard.”

No specific plans are in place, which is why leaders are seeking public input on ideas, McDaniel said.

“We don't know what's going to happen,” he said.

Once an idea is known, the two municipalities will work together to determine cost, feasibility and to complete the project's goals of improving the general aesthetics and enhancing the landscape quality of the corridor; provide mobility and promote safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and walkers; promote river access and recreational areas; preserve historic features and enhance the business areas; protect and enhance natural resources; and provide a plan to preserve community character, McDaniel said.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.