Ambridge-Aliquippa Bridge closure expected to affect Route 65 traffic around Sewickley
Round two of a closure of the Ambridge-Aliquippa Bridge that will last several months is nearing, and its impact will once again be felt in Sewickley, borough officials say.
Beginning March 4, PennDOT plans to close the Beaver County span through mid-November — after last year's closure for the $16.6 million multi-phase construction project.
Similar to the previous closure, PennDOT officials suggest drivers use the Sewickley Bridge, which connects Route 65 to Route 51.
Sewickley officials are preparing for a possible onslaught of traffic, but this time around, borough manager Kevin Flannery said, crews have a better idea of what to expect.
“We're prepared,” Flannery said. “We do anticipate additional traffic here, but we'll be able to handle it.”
Police officers from Moon and Sewickley will be positioned at each end of the bridge for one week to handle the potential for an increase in traffic, with PennDOT paying for those costs, Flannery said.
After the initial week, officers might not be present.
“At this time, we have no plans to spend additional money on police (for the bridge),” Flannery said.
More than 12,500 vehicles cross the Ambridge-Aliquippa Bridge, according to PennDOT data.
As with any road closure, some drivers will find alternative routes, Flannery said.
“We don't expect all of those drivers to use the Sewickley Bridge,” he said. “People seem to find a different way that works for them.”
Flannery said borough crews were expected to place an electronic sign alerting drivers of the impending closure.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.