ShareThis Page

Leetsdale council votes to lower tax rate

Bobby Cherry
| Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

In an effort to avoid an excessive windfall of revenue, Leetsdale Council members lowered the borough's property tax rate to 7.5 mills, down from the 8.5 mills set last month.

Council members approved the new millage last week.

Concern over the possibility of a revenue increase beyond a county-ordered 5-percent limit led to the change.

It would have been a “big windfall, and, obviously, we can't have that,” council President Joe McGurk said.

With the new millage set, Leetsdale could collect about $1.1 million in taxes, according to a borough report.

It should be the last time Leetsdale Council members consider changing the millage this year, McGurk said.

Under an order by Allegheny County Judge R. Stanton Wettick, municipal officials have a few options when deciding on the amount of a millage, including changing the mill rate up until 10 days prior to property tax bills being mailed to property owners.

Leetsdale Council also approved increasing the discount on property tax bills for senior citizens under the county's Act 77 to 35 percent by a 4-3 vote, which involved Mayor Pete Poninsky making the tie-breaking decision. Council members Melanie Dunn, Joe McGurk and Linda Michael voted “no.” Roger Nanni, Osman Awad and Jeff Weatherby voted “yes.” Wes James was absent.

McGurk said he voted against the proposal because he and other council members were given information about an hour before the Feb. 14 council meeting.

Act 77 gives municipal officials the option of making residents who are at least 60 years old, have an annual income of $30,000 or less and have lived in their home for at least 10 years eligible for a local-property-tax reduction.

A vote to increase the borough's homestead exemption from $30,000 to $36,500 was rejected, 2-4. Nanni and Awad voted in favor of the increase.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.