Leetsdale employees will share health care costs
All Leetsdale employees now are required to pay something toward their health insurance.
Employees who opt into health care plans offered by the borough must pay $25 per pay period for use of either a family or single plan, council President Joe McGurk said.
In January, council members discussed requiring only those employees who opt into the family plan to pay. Some council members said they were worried that proposal could be considered discrimination.
Although Solicitor Kate Diersen said last week the borough could charge different amounts for family and individual plans, officials decided to charge everyone the same amount.
Under the rejected proposal to charge only those who opt into a family health care plan, borough leaders said, three of the Leetsdale's five nonuniform employees — which include office staff and public works — would have paid.
Under a contract agreement last year, police officers contribute $25 per pay period for health insurance.
Under the borough's previous health care plan with Highmark, the cost of nonuniform employees' premiums ranged from about $340 for single users to more than $1,000 for families, borough secretary Liz Petalino said.
The borough's new insurance plan is through HealthAmerica. Premium costs were not available.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.