Co-housing development considered for Glen Osborne
The Sewickley Valley is home to a myriad of housing options — from an urban feel in Sewickley, to housing developments in Bell Acres and estates in Sewickley Heights.
Soon, the area could be home to another option in residential living — co-housing.
Residents who live in a co-housing development participate in the day-to-day operations and often share many amenities, said Doug Cooper, chairman of the Glen Osborne Woods membership committee.
His group is seeking to build a co-housing community of about 22 to 24 units in a wooded area along Glen Mitchell Road, not far from its intersection with Beaver Road.
Engineers are conducting feasibility studies of the site, said Cooper, who lives in Friendship.
“We think we can make this work at this site,” he said.
The development could consist of one-, two- or three-bedroom houses for multigenerational families — an important component to a co-housing community, said Cooper, 66.
“In today's world where families are so split off, it gives children growing up in these communities … a chance to grow up with older people who care about them and care about their well-being,” he said.
Co-housing developments offer communal areas and invite residents to become social, helping to make decisions impacting the entire group, Cooper said.
While each unit has its own bathrooms, living and dining rooms and a kitchen, community spaces could offer areas for group meals, gardening, entertaining, guest rooms and a workshop, among other amenities.
While Cooper couldn't provide firm costs, he estimated a family could pay between $250,000 for a smaller unit and $400,000 for a larger one.
Initial investor costs could rise from $5,000 to $10,000 as construction nears, he said.
Being part of a co-housing living environment isn't for everyone, Cooper said.
“People who take part in these communities have to be willing to give to the common good,” he said.
“You're buying your house, but you're also buying a share of the land, plus the common house.
“Lots of people say, ‘It's interesting, but it's not for me.'”
Despite the closeness with neighbors and shared amenities, Cooper said, not everybody in a co-housing environment is going to get along.
“You really are invested in knowing your neighbors,” he said. “But it doesn't mean everybody is going to be your friend. The point is that you get what you hope to get.”
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.