Leetsdale millage could change again
Leetsdale's tax rate could be changing — again.
Council members could vote Thursday to adjust the borough's property tax rate to 8 mills, council President Joe McGurk said.
It would be the third time since December that council members have altered the millage, which was set at 10 mills in 2012 but had to be adjusted based on the Allegheny County property reassessments.
Under state law, officials must reduce millage so not to reap a windfall of extra tax money after a reassessment. Officials in municipalities around Allegheny County also have adjusted tax rates for 2013.
Council approved a 7.5-mill property tax rate last month, but, McGurk said, with 56 assessment appeals pending, the “potential decrease in revenue is mind-boggling” for the community of about 1,200 residents. McGurk said about 20 of those appeals deal with property in the industrial parks.“This has been a nightmare for me,” McGurk said.
In a special meeting held March 1, council members approved, 5-0, to consider changing the millage. Osman Awad and Wes James did not attend.
“We did what we thought would be correct,” McGurk said. “If somehow at the end of the year, we need to change it, we will do so.”
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.