Sewickley area runner headed to Boston Marathon for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
John Paul has run more than 50 miles to help cancer victims, and, on Monday, he plans to run 26.2 more as he participates in the Boston Marathon for the third time to raise money for the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
In the first two years, the Sewickley man raised a total of $10,000, and so far this year, has raised $10,000 more.
Paul, of Edgeworth, will run for the third time with his daughter Caroline, who lives in New York, in honor of his father, Robert, and his wife's father, Mike Galicia, both of whom died of cancer.
Paul, 58, also ran the Columbus, Ohio, marathon this year as a qualifier for the 117th Boston Marathon and does much of his training at Sewickley Valley YMCA and throughout Sewickley.
“I run on Fern Hollow Road and on Blackburn. I have all these routes I run through Sewickley,” he said.
He tries to run about 50 miles a week and has put in a few 22-milers to train for the marathon. When his daughter has been in Sewickley for holidays, they have run together, he said.
Paul, president of Cattron Group in Sharpsville, said he has enjoyed working with Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
“It is a first-class organization,” he said.
He will be among 550 Dana-Farber Marathon Challenge teammates from across the United States and around the world who will run the historic marathon route from Hopkinton, Mass., to Boston with a goal to raise $4.6 million for cancer research.
Joanne Barron is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1406 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.