Sewickley Community Center's request to open day care center denied
Sewickley Community Center's request to establish a day care could hinge on a decision by the borough's zoning hearing board.
Members of the Chadwick Street nonprofit organization are seeking to create a child-care center, but borough Code Enforcement Officer Nancy Watts denied an initial request, explaining that such a facility is not permitted in an industrial zone.
“It's black and white that I had to deny that use,” Watts said.
Watts said that because the center operates with membership dues, she considers it a private club, which is a permitted use in an industrial zone.
Sewickley Community Center spokesman and board member Jim Jackson said the center is operated with “frugal fees” from members, but also offers programming and space to the community at large.
“It's for people with “moderate incomes,” he said.
Jackson said the center previously had a day care.
The center offers a community food bank for residents living in nearby municipalities, and has recreational facilities used by community and school groups, including the Quaker Valley wrestling team, Jackson said.
In addition, the center also offers meeting room spaces for parties, banquets, Jackson said.
Zoning hearing board members are expected to announce a decision at their May 7 meeting.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.