Share This Page

Monitoring of Dickson Road slide in Sewickley continues

| Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Monitoring of a landslide-prone area of Dickson Road has shown part of the land slightly moved.

Over a three-month period, engineers reported that Dickson Road has slipped one-eighth of an inch, borough manager Kevin Flannery said this week.

“But it's fine,” he said. “There's no real issue there.”

In December, engineer Joe Boward told residents of Dickson Road, and Farren and Miller streets their properties were located in an “ancient landslide area” that has been sliding for “at least a couple thousand years.”

Flannery said no homes are in immediate danger; only the road appears affected.

A multi-tiered retaining wall with extensive site grading could solve the issue, but that could cost as much as $15 million, according to an engineer's report.

A more cost-effective plan could involve stabilizing with soldier pile and lagging walls in two particular areas of concern — one on Miller Street and another at a hairpin turn at Dickson Road and Miller.

Costs for those two projects could be more than $300,000, according to a report.

The hillside will continue to be monitored, and officials are expected to determine this spring how water is flowing nearby.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or rcherry@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.