ShareThis Page

Students to choose Quaker Valley prom queen, Mr. QV

| Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 9:44 p.m.
Four Quaker Valley High School seniors are vying for the title of 2013 prom queen. They are: (top row; from left) Sierra Perlik and Courtney Kroner; and (bottom row, from left) Morgan Felt and Rachel Silverstein. The queen will be announced during the grand march May 17 at the school. Submitted.
Quaker Valley seniors competing for the title of Mr. QV May 10 are: (From top, left to right): Ryan Garbee and Rocco Brown; Dante Piccolo and Jake Pilewicz; Jack McGarry and Burke Moser; Stephen Wei and Roy Hadfield; and Johnathan Roppo and Levi Bowers. Not pictured, Andy House. Submitted.

Four Quaker Valley High School seniors will be vying for the title of prom queen and 11 candidates will be competing for the Mr. QV title this year.

Candidates for prom queen include Morgan Felt, Courtney Kroner, Sierra Perlik and Rachel Silverstein.

Seniors voted for prom queen candidates on April 24 and the results will be announced at the Grand March Promenade, which begins at 5:15 p.m. May 17 in the Quaker Valley High School auditorium.

The prom, titled “A Night in Versailles,” will begin at 6 p.m. at the Embassy Suites in Moon Township.

The annual Mr. QV pageant will be held at 7 p.m. May 10 in the high school auditorium.

Competing for the title will be seniors Levi Bowers, Rocco Brown, Ryan Garbee, Roy Hadfield, Andy House, Jack McGarry, Burke Moser, Dante Piccolo, Jake Pilewicz, Johnathan Roppo and Stephen Wei.

Tickets are $7 in advance or $10 at the door. Proceeds from the event, sponsored by the National Honor Society, will benefit the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.

The emcees for Mr. QV are teachers Jeff Sebastian and Michael Haboush. The panel of judges includes principal Andrew Surloff and teachers Robert Harrah, Kerry McGrath Rita Hoepp and Robin Russell.

For more prom information, visit

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.