Funding needed for Sewickley theater
Organizers of an effort to build a nonprofit movie theater in Sewickley's business district say $1.5 million in pledges is needed by June 30.
“If we don't feel we have the funding, the board will sit down and build on what to do next,” Village Theater Co. spokeswoman Patty Jones said. “We are not going to dissolve.”
About $600,000 has been pledged so far, which includes about $100,000 from a fundraiser held last month, Jones said.
The group's self-imposed deadline would allow the board of directors to move forward with a plan to begin the project in September, Jones said.
“We would love to have enough funds to move forward,” she said. “We need the summer months to hire an architect and go through the bidding process.”
Land has been pledged by Thorn-Walnut Management, LLC, under project manager Peter Friday, to build a theater in an area between Thorn and Beaver streets, near Green Street.
If organizers can't secure plans for a theater after a specified period time, they might lose the opportunity to use the land, Jones said.
She did not specify how much time the group had.
In March, Sewickley Council approved a plan for a proposed three-story, roughly 10,000-square-foot office building at 417 Thorn St.
The building would be part of an area being referred to as Theater Square, which also could include retail space, the theater and a public parking garage.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.