Board OKs Sewickley Community Center child care facility
By fall, there could be a new child care center in Sewickley.
Sewickley Community Center officials received approval from Sewickley zoning hearing board members last week to once again host child care services at the Chadwick Street facility.
Code enforcement officer Nancy Watts denied an initial request. She said such a facility is not permitted in an industrial zone.
The community center previously had a child care center, but it had ended operations. It was unclear how long ago that center closed.
But in the board's determination, member Gary Gladowski said, the center's nonconforming use was not abandoned because the community center continued to operate.
Natasha Rostchild of Aliquippa will run the center, which will serve children in kindergarten through the fifth grade.
She said she expects to open by fall.
Rostchild previously operated a similar center at St. Andrews United Presbyterian Church on Beaver Street from June through February.
There, Rostchild said, 12 children were enrolled in the program.
She said moving to the community center “is going to be a huge benefit to the program with more recreational activities for the children.”
Community center spokesman and board member Jim Jackson said the community center is operated with “frugal fees” from members but also offers programming and space to the community at large.
“It's for people with “moderate incomes,” he said.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Koch: Even a tropical paradise is painted with black and gold
- Sewickley Heights couple named Good Samaritans
- Growing third-grade class sizes a concern at Quaker Valley