Share This Page

Photos: Quaker Valley prom offers night to remember

| Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 2:06 p.m.
Amber Flevaris and prom king Johnathan Roppo participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Prom queen Sierra Perlik and date Sam Tyson participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Matt Stock and Caroline Steliotis participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Twins Michelle Starke and Sara Starke participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Andy House and Katie Manuel participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Jack Regueiro and Heather Peduzzi participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Stephen Wei and Emily Veeck participate in the grand march at Quaker Valley High School before the prom Friday, May 17, 2013.

Quaker Valley students attended the school's annual prom Friday. Before the prom was the traditional grand march, held at the high school in Leetsdale.

Sierra Perlik was crowned prom queen. Johnathan Roppo was named prom king.

Kristina Serafini is a photographer and reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1405 or kserafini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.