Quaker Valley students take part in Pennsylvania geography webinar
By Joanne Barron
Published: Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
It's not often elementary school students get so excited about a social studies lesson that they jump up and down, slap each others' hands and yell “Woo!” when they get the right answers.
But that's what happened last week when three Edgeworth Elementary School fourth-grade classes participated in a webinar event with fourth-graders in two other schools elsewhere in the state.
They were part of the state Department of Education's and Chester County Intermediate Unit's “Where in PA?” program.
Gabrielle Miller, Edgeworth librarian, said students at the Quaker Valley school have been preparing all year for the event.
They were challenged to find the location of the other two schools and to prepare a presentation with clues about where their own school is located.
Each school gave clues using Blackboard Collaborate, an online platform projected onto screens that students at all three schools could see at the same time.
Miller said students used a Power Point presentation and worked with Sandra Calgaro, technology teacher at Edgeworth, to use PhotoShop. They introduced clues as a news broadcast with some students acting as reporters and others holding and hiding behind a yellow banner with the words Western Pennsylvania as a backdrop.
Newscasters reported weird sightings in the area, such as a girl on top of the Point State Park fountain.
Miller said the presentation was inspired by the “Wacky Wednesday” book by Theo LeSieg (Dr. Seuss).
Other clues were: the average temperature (77), population (3,835), and terrain (knolls and grassy).
They told other students their school was located 13 miles from Point State Park; many students can walk or ride a bike to school; and famous author Mary Roberts Rinehart lived 15 minutes from their school,
Other classrooms presented clues with song remixes and rapping and a game in which a cab driver, played by a student, asked students in his class questions about their location. Students were awarded fake money for correct answers.
Afterward, students were given 25 minutes to research clues to guess where the other schools were located.
Each of the fourth-grade classes was permitted to ask one question of the other schools, which all the fourth-graders could hear, before they made their final guesses and the “big reveal” was made.
Emma Pulkowski, Claire Kuzma and McAuley Kriebel made one incorrect guess, but when Emma found a town with the exact population that one of the classrooms gave in its clue presentation she knew her group had it right — Kennett Square.
Emma said the best thing about the program was “doing all the practicing and learning about all the towns and the names of all the towns.”
She and her group also liked the song remixes the other schools presented.
“I liked that it wasn't all serious. They made it fun,” McAuley said.
Edgeworth students named Warrington as the other school after finding out the famous garden in the town was Longwood Garden.
One of the schools guessed Sewickley correctly, while the other guessed Allegheny City.
Edgeworth students revealed their location by holding up a yellow banner with the words, “Sewickley, Pa., Quaker Valley School District, Edgeworth Elementary School,” and all 73 students yelled, “Sewickley!”
Joanne Barron is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1406 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.