ShareThis Page

Photos: Volunteers 'redd up' river bank around Sewickley

| Tuesday, June 18, 2013, 4:30 p.m.
Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Ed Kramer of Cecil, marine safety officer for the Pittsburgh division of the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary, tosses trash into a garbage bag during the River Sweep at the U.S. Coast Guard Station in Glen Osborne Saturday, June 15, 2013. This was the first year crews have cleaned up near the base during the annual River Sweep.
Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Volunteer Kristen Davis, 15, of Beaver carries garbage bags as she looks for trash along the shore near the Coast Guard Station in Glen Osborne as part of the River Sweep Saturday, June 15, 2013.
Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Bob Davis of Beaver, commander of the Pittsburgh division of the Coast Guard Auxiliary, wheels a tire up a hill along the Ohio River near the Coast Guard station in Glen Osborne during the River Sweep Saturday, June 15, 2013.
Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Charles Southworth of Ohio Township walks through tall grass and weeds looking for trash during River Sweep near the state Fish & Boat Commission boat ramp in Glenfield Saturday, June 15, 2013. Southworth said the cleanup, organized by the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission, was more difficult this year than last because of the higher river level.

Volunteers at three sites in the Sewickley Valley removed litter and debris from the banks of the Ohio River on Saturday during the annual Ohio River Sweep.

The event — which began in 1989 — is organized by the Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission.

More than 20,000 volunteers last year participated in cleanup sites from the river's start in downtown Pittsburgh to its end in Cairo, Ill. They collected more than 20,000 tons of debris.

Kristina Serafini is a photographer and reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.