Quaker Valley to add kindergarten teacher; approves '13-14 budget
Quaker Valley school directors will use $170,800 of reserve funds to close a funding gap in the 2013-14 school year's $42.1 million budget.
The board approved the budget last week.
The property tax rate was set at 16.93 mills, meaning a Sewickley Borough homeowner whose property is valued at $180,700 would pay $3,059 — a decrease of about $780 from 2012-13.
In Bell Acres, a property valued at $139,550 would see a decline of about $600 with a 2013-14 tax bill of $2,362.
A majority of district revenues — 84 percent — are derived from local taxpayers, district leaders said.
The 2013-14 year budget is about 2.68 percent larger than the current year's budget. Of that, about 2 percent represents state-mandated increases to employee retirement costs, according to district officials.
Administrators will see wage concessions and freezes, Superintendent Joseph Clapper said.
A three-year administration contract calls for an average salary increase of 2.2 percent, reduction of bonuses and includes the elimination of one position.
In addition, teacher and support staff groups have been in talks with district leaders regarding possible concessions.
“Our staff understands the financial challenges that public schools face,” Clapper said.
The new budget calls for the addition of one kindergarten teacher.
It also retains a $497,000 contribution to the Sewickley Public Library, which is overseen by the district.
Students in grades 6-12 will continue with a one-to-one laptop program with a new four-year technology plan approved as part of the new budget.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.