Sewickley parking rates could rise with proposed garage
By Bobby Cherry
Published: Wednesday, July 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Parking rates in Sewickley could double early next year if council members continue moving forward with plans to build a nearly 300-vehicle public garage.
Metered spaces across the municipality and inside a proposed garage could cost as much as $1 an hour. That amount could rise to $2 for special events and Saturday parking, which now is free, in the garage proposed to be constructed between Walnut and Green streets at the site of the former Ascot Motors dealership.
Council members could decide by mid-September whether to build a garage on a site also shared by a proposed two-screen nonprofit movie theater.
Borough leaders say they're trying to solve what has historically been a parking problem — “whether or not it's a perceived problem or a problem of convenience,” council President Bob Hague said.
“In my 20 years, ‘parking' has been one word used over and over and over again.
“We're trying to make a long-term solution to not only address present needs, but future needs.”
Addressing those needs comes at a cost. Construction of a 297-vehicle public garage could cost nearly $6 million, borough manager Kevin Flannery said.
That does not include the cost of moving Hoey's Run — a stream located underneath the proposed site — which could be as much as $500,000.
Including purchasing the land and installing new parking machines, costs associated with a garage could reach $8 million, Flannery said.
Borough leaders say money borrowed would be repaid through revenue generated by the garage.
“The people who are essentially going to be paying for it — not the taxpayers — but the people who use it,” Hague said.
Flannery estimates nearly $800,000 could be generated through leases and six-day-a-week use of the garage.
Flannery called his estimates conservative with only partial use of the garage calculated. He also is recommending council members approve 24-hour metered garage parking. Street parking likely would remain 9 a.m. 5 p.m., he said.
Council members earlier this month approved the transfer of $910,000 from various reserve funds and the general fund to cover the cost of purchasing 21,000 square feet of land and what they call a “reasonable expectation” to reimburse the borough's general fund and other operating and reserve funds, including any borrowing of money, for acquisition of the land.
Both motions passed unanimously.
The land is owned by One Thorn Street LLC.
Without addressing parking, Mayor Brian Jeffe said future development could be stymied in the business district.
With the proposed 30,000 square feet of office and retail space expected to begin going up this summer in the area around Thorn and Walnut streets, parking spaces needed to accommodate development are a premium, Jeffe said.
Council member Susan Aleshire agreed, saying the business district needs ample parking for future development and to entice shoppers to town.
“If we don't do it, it's a missed opportunity,” she said. “We have so much going on in town now … it's just going to continue.”
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.