Leetsdale seeking municipal manager
More than a year after Leetsdale Council members eliminated the borough-manager position, leaders are seeking to once again fill the role.
In a job posting on the borough's website, Leetsdale officials have set an Aug. 23 deadline for applicants interested in the borough manager job.
Leetsdale Council President Joe McGurk could not immediately be reached for comment on Wednesday. No one answered the Leetsdale Borough office phone this afternoon.
McGurk and four other council members ran on a campaign pledge in 2011 to eliminate the borough-manager and junior-clerk positions and reinstate Elizabeth Petalino as secretary/treasurer.
In January 2012, then-manager Paul Scimio was ousted from his position following accusations that some officials improperly used borough-issued credit cards.
Following a state Ethics Commission investigation, Scimio last year was ordered to pay $1,078 to Leetsdale as part of a consent agreement after the commission determined he violated the state Ethics Act by using a borough-issued credit card for personal expenses.
The commission found that Scimio did not use his authority as a councilman to secure his job in 2010 as borough manager.
In the ad for a new borough manager, resumes are directed to the Allegheny County Department of Community and Economic Development.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.