Crosswalks coming to Beaver Road in Glen Osborne
Work to create crosswalks and paint lines on Beaver Road began earlier this week.
Glen Osborne leaders plan to spend $13,000 on 12 crosswalks and painting lines for the roadway, Mayor Bill Boswell said. An additional $6,000 was spent on sidewalk ramps and curbs. Paving Beaver Road cost $230,000, Boswell said.
Crosswalks could have been costly, he said.
“If we had done the special brickwork — which all of us liked very much — it would have cost us $43,000 instead of $13,000,” Boswell said. “We'll use the savings for another project. We don't have the pedestrian traffic Sewickley does.”
Crosswalks will be located around McKown Lane, Osborne Lane, Orchard Street, Glen Mitchell and one near Osborne Elementary School.
With a smooth road, leaders anticipate some drivers will try exceeding the 25 mph posted limit and a 15 mph zone at the beginning and end of the school day.
“Most people will obey those speed limits,” Quaker Valley administrative services director Joe Marrone said. “But there are always those who don't, and that's why the police are there. It's all about the safety of this kids.”
Boswell said borough officials discussed installing speed humps in the road but decided against them for now so they first can determine the severity of the expected speeding situation.
Joanne Barron is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1406 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.