Woman seeking owner of possible Tuskegee Airman's locket
An Ohio woman is on a mission to find the owner of a locket she believes belongs to a Tuskegee Airman.
Samantha Heald-Sott said she found the brass locket about a month ago at the bottom of a junk box at a flea market just outside of Canton, Ohio. She purchased it for $2.
“When I picked it up, I couldn't put it back down,” Heald-Sott said.
“It was way too disrespectful to be at the bottom of a junk box.”
Heald-Sott said her dad, who she described as a history buff and a Korean War veteran, told her he suspected it belonged to an airman or a family member of one.
The locket housed three photos inside, including the suspected Tuskegee Airman and a middle-aged woman wearing a hat.
Heald-Sott said another photo of a younger woman was underneath the photo of the man when she popped it out to see if there was a name on the back.
“Every time I pick it up, I get goosebumps,” she said.
Heald-Sott said she isn't looking for money for the locket — she just wants to return it to its rightful owner.
She attended Sunday's Tuskegee Airmen Memorial dedication at Sewickley Cemetery to hand out photos of the locket in the hopes of someone recognizing any of the faces.
“Any kind of leads I could get to find the owners would be awesome,” she said.
Heald-Sott can be reached at email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Kristina Serafini is a photographer and staff writer for the Sewickley Herald. She can be reached at 412-324-1405 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.