Sewickley Valley nonprofits participate in Day of Giving
Next Thursday marks the annual The Pittsburgh Foundation Day of Giving.
Sixteen Sewickley-area organizations are participating in this year's Day of Giving — a Web-only fundraising event geared to helping Western Pennsylvania nonprofits collect donations.
Marking its third year in the campaign is the Sewickley Public Library, which last year earned more than $9,000 through Day of Giving and a corporate match, Director Carolyn Toth said.
“It helps us with so many of our expenses, including the facility and the collection,” she said.
“Undergoing a strategic plan, we're considering a lot of factors and some of those factors are opening the circulation space and moving the teen space. It will give us some room to do some extras we're looking at.”
Twelve members of the Sewickley Area Non-Profit Consortium are working to increase donations.
“What we are asking is for area residents to give at home first — support those organizations supporting the Sewickley Valley community,” Sewickley Valley YMCA CEO Trish Hooper said.
Nonprofits participating in a collective marketing effort include the Y, Allegheny Land Trust, Family Guidance, Child Health Association of Sewickley, Fern Hollow Nature Center, Mary & Alexander Laughlin Children's Center, Pittsburgh Fellows, the library, Sweetwater Center for the Arts, Union Aid Society, Watson Institute and Village Green Partners.
“All of us are seeing an increasing need for our services in the community,” Laughlin Children's Center Executive Director Doug Florey said. “Collectively, we're encouraging the Sewickley area Day-of-Giving donors to step up and help us.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Life Unleashed: Stress-free training found on pet store shelves
- Koch: Movie buff gets peek behind the scenes
- No more half days for Quaker Valley students
- Quaker Valley, Sewickley Academy officials tout benefits of completing projects prior to graduation
- Quaker Valley hires assistant principal, promotes elementary principal
- Public-use spaces a concern with Sewickley private-garage proposal