Quaker Valley boasts record roster of scholars
Sixty-six Quaker Valley High School students were named AP Scholars, including one national AP Scholar — a record number for the district, administrators said.
“As the most rigorous high school program in the country, AP courses help to prepare our students for success beyond Quaker Valley,” high school Principal Andrew Surloff said.
“Our students' high level of achievement on these exams validates the high quality instruction that happens in our classrooms each day.”
In May, 159 Quaker Valley students completed 303 AP exams in 21 subjects, according to the district.
Those students earned a 93-percent pass rate — which is a record high for Quaker Valley, administrators said.
The state average was a 58-percent pass rate, district spokeswoman Tina Vojtko said.
More than 40 percent of Quaker Valley students who participated in the AP exams were named scholars.
“Quaker Valley prides itself on offering all students opportunities for advanced learning,” Superintendent Joseph Clapper said.
“As a result, more than half of our graduates successfully completed at least one AP exam during their high school career.
“That is phenomenal.”
The College Board's Advanced Placement Program allows students to take college-level courses while still in high school, and to receive college credit, advanced placement or both for successful performance on AP Exams.
AP tests are given scores of 1-5. Students must earn a 3 or higher to pass and qualify for college credit. At Quaker Valley, 53 percent of the Class of 2013 completed and passed at least one AP exam.
Quaker Valley offers 21 AP courses — including six online.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.