Duquesne Light to remove poles as part of agreement in Edgeworth
More than a year after a power-distribution line was strung along Route 65 in Edgeworth, utility poles that were to be removed as part of the project could begin being taken out by the end of the month, a Duquesne Light spokesman said.
As part of a 2011 agreement to place a 23-kilovolt distribution line on Edgeworth property — along the southbound lanes of Route 65 — Duquesne Light officials were to have 18 utility poles removed.
Borough Manager Marty McDaniel estimated about 12 poles remain standing.
Remaining poles will be removed, Duquesne Light spokesman Joey Vallarian said.
“The remaining poles still have some communications cables on them, which will be removed the last week of October,” he said.
The reason the poles have not come down is because remaining utilities — including phone, cable, Internet and fiber-optic — with wires using those poles must be removed, Vallarian said.
“Many times, this requires an engineering solution to be done before hand, as well as outages with customers, which is what is going on now,” he said. “As soon as everything is off, the poles will be removed.”
Duquesne Light leaders in 2011 proposed a power-distribution line through Edgeworth. After residents asked that the line not run along borough streets, municipal leaders and officials with the power company agreed on a plan to run the wire along Route 65.
The initial proposal could have removed several trees along the northbound lanes of Route 65 between Edgeworth and Church lanes.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.