Second threat in as many days forces Quaker Valley evacuation; administrators seek answers
A second threat in as many days forced the evacuation of Quaker Valley High School Tuesday.
A written threat was discovered in a restroom at the high school around 12:50 p.m. Tuesday, district spokeswoman Tina Vojtko said.
Students and staff were evacuated to Chuck Knox Stadium and remain there until around 2 p.m. while police searched the building, she said. Beaver Street from Village Drive to Camp Meeting Road remained closed during the search. The roadway reopened to traffic around 2 p.m.
Students will be dismissed from the school at their normal time, Vojtko said.
A similar threat discovered yesterday prompted an evacuation.
Consecutive days with threats prompted a letter from district Superintendent Joseph Clapper to parents Tuesday night.
“In addition to disrupting the learning environment, these incidents have needlessly caused worry and anxiety for parents and family members of both students and staff,” he wrote.
In the letter, Clapper asked parents to talk with their children about the implications of making threats.
“Students who communicate their desire or intention to cause harm to students, teachers or a school building, even in a joking manner, will be taken seriously and will face severe disciplinary consequences up to and including expulsion,” Clapper wrote.
“Please help to reinforce the philosophy that school safety is everyone's business by talking with your child about the importance of informing an adult anytime something is said or done that makes him/her feel unsafe — this includes verbal and physical threats as well as bullying.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.