Student who made bomb threats at Quaker Valley identified
A Quaker Valley High School student faces disciplinary action after school leaders say the individual was responsible for forcing the evacuation of the building twice this week.
Written bomb threats discovered in a restroom of the Leetsdale school forced students and staff to evacuate Monday and Tuesday.
“The swift action of our local police and our high school administrators is appreciated,” Superintendent Joseph Clapper said. “All threats – real or perceived – are taken seriously and will result in the most severe disciplinary consequences possible.”
Citing privacy issues, administrators said they could not release information regarding the student or what disciplinary action the student might face. Leaders said it was unclear if the student acted alone.
Leetsdale police Chief James Santucci said the investigation will continue.
“It will continue to see if there were any people that were assisting in this terrible ordeal,” he said.
Principal Andrew Surloff commended Santucci.
“Chief Santucci's masterful job of coordinating emergency management services from across the county allowed us to run our drills and procedures in the most efficient ways possible, taking the least amount of time, with the least amount of disruption, and with the ability to seal off our campus with great proficiency,” Surloff said. “The chief then followed up the next day to assist in our investigation and to identify the student responsible in less than 24 hours.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.