Sewickley public parking garage no-go for now
Plans for a nearly 300-space public parking garage in Sewickley's business district have been shelved — at least for now.
“The parking garage is on hold until we figure out how we're going to pay for it,” Mayor Brian Jeffe said.
Jeffe said 100 spaces needed to be leased to make funding work for the garage.
“Until we figure out how the users are going to pay for it, it's on the back burner.”
Sewickley leaders introduced an idea earlier this year to construct a garage and aggressively moved over the summer to finance construction.
“There is nothing in here for the parking garage,” said Jeffe, referring to the proposed 2014 borough budget.
Plans were halted last month when borough leaders couldn't solidify a feasible payment plan, Jeffe said. Leaders said the garage could cost at least$6 million.
Instead, council members opted for a parking-needs analysis.
Results of the study are supposed to be available in January.
Jeffe noted that finding a place to park in the business district can be easy many days.
Until borough leaders can decipher if a public garage could become part of the business district landscape, land where the garage is proposed could be turned into a flat-surface lot, Jeffe said.
Construction of a flat-surface lot could cost about $200,000 and add about 20 parking spaces, he said.
“No sense spending a lot of money if you're going to bulldoze it over and put a parking garage there,” Jeffe said.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.