Firm to help determine Sewickley parking needs
A public meeting later this month could help determine parking needs for Sewickley's business district.
Borough leaders and a representative from Chicago-based consulting firm Kimley-Horn and Associates will host the meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Nov. 21 in the borough building.
Business owners, residents and others are encouraged to attend to offer input on parking, borough manager Kevin Flannery said.
“And he's going to be happy to sit and talk with every single person (who attends),” Flannery said.
The representative will be in the municipalityNov. 20 conducting research as part of a parking-needs assessment council members approved last month.
Borough leaders approved spending $25,700 for Kimley-Horn and Associates to perform the analysis. Bill Cornman and Robert Glenn dissented.
Among projects Kimley-Horn touts on its website are a mixed-use development in downtown Raleigh, N.C., that included a nearly 1,000-space parking garage, a seven-level office building and about 20,000 square feet of street-level retail space.
In addition, the company has been part of several large-scale municipalprojects, including the design of an 11-mile light-railtransit line connecting Minneapolis to St. Paul, Minn.
Sewickley leaders say the study could help determine the amount of parking needed in the future.
Earlier this year, leaders began discussing plans to construct a nearly 300-space garage on Walnut Street. Those plans were shelved at least until the parking study was completed.
The study is expected to be released in January, Flannery said.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.