Leetsdale bridge slated for demo delayed
A Leetsdale bridge closed to vehicles won't soon come down, leaders say.
The Leet Street Bridge — closed to traffic since it failed an inspection over the summer — will remain standing through at least the first half of next year, said Anthony Rosenberger of Centerside Industrial Development in the Leetsdale Industrial Park.
Leetsdale Council President Joe McGurk confirmed that information.
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. officials withdrew a request to the state to remove their portion of the bridge that connectsBeaver Street to Washington Street, crossing over Route 65 and railroad tracks.
In the fall, leaders said railroad officials considered removing their portion of the bridge over tracks, potentially leaving a bridge to nowhere because the portion owned by PennDOT was in decent shape, state officials reported.
Now, McGurk said, there is a chance the entire bridge ultimately could be torn down and replaced with pedestrian access.
“If the bridge does go down, they'll replace it with a pedestrian walkway to allow people to get the bus on Beaver Street (and) to cross safely,” he said.
Norfolk Southern officials earlier agreed to tear down their half, which extends over railroad tracks, at a cost of $77,000.
Pedestrians access remains, but a portion of the sidewalk is closed because of its poor condition.
Residents have said they feared how the loss of the bridge could affect an evacuation plan in the event of an emergency at one of the nearby industrial parks.
Councilman Roger Nanni said he wanted to see the bridge receive historical status, but Rosenberger said the bridge is not eligible.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.