Share This Page

I'm resolving not to make resolutions this year

| Wednesday, Jan. 1, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Why do we do this to ourselves — and to those around us — year, after year, after year.

I'm speaking, of course, about those three words that bring great promise and skepticism with them: New Year's resolutions.

I'm guilty of it, too. Every year on Jan. 1, I take my place at my imaginary podium, raise my finger in the air in determination and, along with throngs of other Americans — as if running for some sort of office — promise to do the right thing, either for myself or others.

“I'm going to lose weight.”

“This is the year I'm going to quit smoking.”

“In the next 12 months, I swear I'm going to finish that project.”

“I'll be nicer to people, learn patience.”

And the list goes on and on and on.

Here's the thing. Why the heck do we wait until that fateful first day of the year each year to state vows we should be sticking with all year long?

I'll tell you why — not to state, with conviction, what we plan to do, but instead, to say in a falsely assured tone, the stuff we actually, deep down, know we should have taken care of long ago.

And in the end, we always seem to fall short, to disappoint ourselves and each other when we don't stick to our Jan. 1 campaign promise.

So this year, I'm not going to call it that. I'm not going to make a New Year's resolution. Instead, I'm just going to admit that my to-do list — of things I should know better about, be more ambitious about and be healthier about — just keeps getting longer.

But this time, maybe I'll keep a pencil right there beside it — and check things off for a change.

Mya Koch is news editor of the Sewickley Herald. She can be reached at 412-324-1403 or mkoch@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.