Quaker Valley computer labs could see upgrade
As Quaker Valley School District administrators work to prepare a 2014-15 budget, two computer labs in the high school could be on target for new machines, district administrators say.
Computers in the labs are outdated, making it difficult to use newer software and applications on those devices, academic services Director Jillian Bichsel said.
“We do know that we need to upgrade,” she said.
Labs are used for art courses, computer-aided drawing, Web design and other technology-related classes. In addition, some students who take online courses use the labs.
“They take a beating,” Superintendent Joseph Clapper said. “It's not like one individual on a computer. It's kids coming in from one period to the next period to the next period beating on a computer for eight years. I'm really surprised they're still here.”
Computers would be replaced through a lease, Bichsel said.
Last year, district leaders spent $559,500 on a four-year lease for 1,173 computers, and purchased 500 Chromebooks and accessories.
Leased computers include 490 Dells, 428 MacBook Airs, 205 MacBook Pros and 50 iMacs. Quaker Valley had used mostly Apple computers since about 2001.
Most of the MacBook Airs, MacBook Pros and iMacs are used by staff and administration.
It's unclear what other new items or programs could be part of next school year, Clapper said.
“We'll have to take a hard look at what we can afford to do and then prioritize,” he said. The district's budget is roughly $42 million.
“We already told the principals and administrators that the budget's flat. So they're not supposed to turn in any increases in their budget over the previous year.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Quaker Valley board renews church’s lease of Osborne school
- Edgeworth woman believes oak trees cause her danger
- Party hosts, singer enhance Fourth of July celebrations for Sewickley-area residents
- Quaker Valley Families await word of kindergarten location
- Cyclists’ safety at heart of Sewickley discussion