Quaker Valley leaders debate use for Leetsdale homes
Quaker Valley leaders say they have considered renting out two Leetsdale homes the school district purchased for $400,000 nearly two years ago.
In a public meeting last week, Superintendent Joseph Clapper said leaders “had a discussion about that, but, I mean, we can entertain that discussion again.”
Board member Robert Riker said renting the properties could be difficult.
“It's somewhat complicated … as a public body if we have to operate those properties as a landlord,” he said.
Board member Marianne Wagner asked whether the homes have been checked while they have been unoccupied because they could “start to deteriorate” if left unattended.
But administrative services Director Joe Marrone said district workers regularly check the two homes. He said the homes are heated.
School board members in 2012 approved spending $400,000 to purchase two homes — 704 Beaver St. for $250,000 and 706 Beaver St. for $150,000.
Initial plans called for the construction of a parking lot and an off-street student drop-off area on the site where three homes sit.
However, school officials and property owners at 700 Beaver St. — which is adjacent to the high school — have not reached an agreement.
It is the last property remaining between the district's high school and the two acquired properties.
Wagner asked if there is an update relating to the home at 700 Beaver St.
Clapper said: “Not right now.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.