ShareThis Page

In Focus: All those Olympic events have planted me on the couch

Kristina Serafini
| Friday, Feb. 14, 2014, 1:00 p.m.

I could blame the weather for my laziness this February.

No one would even bat an eyelash if I used that excuse as to why I haven't been doing much of anything except being a couch potato lately.

It's true, I am tired of the snow and the cold and the ice, but my do-nothingness is solely the result of the Olympics.

As I write this column on Monday, I've just come off of a weekend full of sitting and watching intently as one amazing 15-year-old Russian stunned in figure skating, the United States grabbed the gold in men's and women's slopestyle, and a favorite to win men's downhill instead took a disappointing eighth place.

I even watched events I normally would pass over, such as the biathlon and ski jumping.

Because of the time difference between here and Sochi, I've tried to limit my time on Twitter so that I don't spoil the outcomes of the events I'd like to see for myself.

It's not working, so far, because I just can't seem to stay away.

Social media platforms such as Twitter have done a great job in taking us behind the scenes of the games, giving us access to things we might not otherwise see; things sometimes equally as entertaining as the games themselves.

Dual toilets. Unfinished hotels and yellow tap water. A bobsledder busting through a bathroom door like the Kool-Aid Man after getting himself locked inside. A stray dog barking at cross country skiers, which, to me, brings visions of the classic Nintendo game “Paperboy.”

And it's only week one.

I've always thought it would be cool to go to the Olympics. I think the Vancouver games especially would've been a ton of fun. But having constant access to the games right at my fingertips and watching the events from the comfort of my own couch isn't so bad.

If you need me, you know where to find me for the next 10 days.

Kristina Serafini is a photographer and writer for the Sewickley Herald. Contact her at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.