Sewickley manager: More snow, more cost
Sewickley Manager Kevin Flannery said he is hopeful the borough can get through winter without paying higher prices for salt.
As the borough's supply fluctuates, so, too, does the price municipal leaders pay. Under an agreement signed last year, Flannery said, Sewickley leaders can purchase about an additional 300 tons at $57.52 per ton. After that, the price goes to $63.27.
Should the borough reach the maximum allowed at that price, Flannery said the bill would rise to a “whopping” $81.62 per ton.
Before snow earlier this week, Flannery said the borough had about 500 tons of salt in storage.
During each storm, Flannery estimates, the borough uses about 20 to 30 tons.
The borough has recorded more than 24 incidents of snow this season. Through the same time last year, the borough recorded 13 cases.
He said the problem with the current winter season is that each snowfall drops smaller amounts of snow, but crews still use the same amount of salt each time.
Along with salt for weather-related issues, Flannery said the borough uses it for emergencies.
“I still order (salt) because with a water (line) break or fire, they easily could use 40 or 50 tons of salt in fighting that effort.”
A series of storms dropped 3.3 inches of snow on the region on Monday night and Tuesday morning, causing Quaker Valley to cancel classes for the fifth time this year.
“It was a pretty dynamic little system,” said Mike Kennedy, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service Pittsburgh office in Moon. “It was a mixed bag of precipitation that had a good impact, even when it wasn't snow.”
The storm dumped snow and sleet on the region, combined with strong winds, Kennedy said.
Daveen Rae Kurutz contributed to this story. Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Missing Sewickley teen found safe
- Laughlin Center therapist reaches out to Inner Mongolia orphans
- Sewickley to move forward with tree-removal plan
- Rough winter exacts a toll from Glen Osborne nature park
- Edgeworth ordinances would control water pollution
- Give yourselves a round of applause
- Sewickley weighs options to stem residents’ tree concerns