Sewickley councilman: Lack of business addresses causing problems
Finding an address might be easy using Google Maps, but one Sewickley council member says finding a street number is difficult to do when walking the business district.
Council member Bill Cornman said a lack of street addresses on businesses in Sewickley is a nuisance for potential customers and could be detrimental in an emergency situation.
“There's an incredible amount of commercial businesses that do not have their street address on the window or their door. That's bad,” Cornman said. “If there's an emergency or whatever the case may be, it may be difficult for people to find that location.”
Cornman said he and council President Susan Aleshire earlier this month were looking for a specific location on Beaver Street for a meeting but could not immediately find the correct spot because of a lack of displayed numbers.
“I was shocked that there were no street numbers on the majority of retail shops,” he said.
Aleshire said with some businesses located on the second floor of buildings, finding the correct address could prove more difficult.
Borough manager Kevin Flannery said staff members would look into the issue.
He cited 911 laws that require proper addresses to be displayed.
“(With) 911, you're supposed to have an address,” he said. “It always was a requirement of 911.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Pirates gaining bad big-game rep
- Steelers quarterback Vick getting more acquainted with offense
- Pitt O-line responds to coach’s challenge
- Pirates notebook: Fastball command issues hurt Cole against Cubs
- Steelers hoping to establish run early against San Diego
- Hydrangeas flower year after year with proper care, placement, feeding
- Penn State coaches are happy with quarterback Hackenberg’s play
- Ten Commandments monument moved to its new home in Connellsville
- NFL notebook: Ex-Pitt RB Lewis signs 2-year extension with Patriots
- What’s old is new at Toll Gate Revival in Lawrenceville
- Rossi: Cole is simply not good enough for Pirates