Sewickley's Village Green Partners funding, performance to be linked in $80,000 contract
Performance metrics detailing such items as Facebook “likes” and email addresses collected for regularly planned e-newsletters are part of a contract worth $80,000 in taxpayer money to a nonprofit group marketing Sewickley's business district.
Metrics — which provide a way to measure performance — achieved this year could produce more funding for next year. Sewickley Council members approved the Village Green Partners contract and performance metrics last week by an 8-1 vote. Member Carole Ford voted no, saying she thought the money allocated to the group was “too much.”
“It is good for any organization to have measured metrics to help ensure that the focus stays on the things that will help drive the mission,” said Jennifer Markus, president of the Sewickley-based nonprofit that works to promote the business district through marketing and organizing events throughout the year, such as Light Up Night. “As we continue to evolve and grow as an organization, the metrics will change.”
Metrics will offer quarterly checkpoints tied to funding levels for next year, according to the group's contract.
“If we hit our targets, we are rewarded financially,” Markus said. “If we do not, we are penalized financially. This is the first year, so we will see how it works out.”
Metrics are broken into five areas: paid partnerships established with local businesses, e-newsletter contacts, Facebook “likes,” fundraising for the Christmas season's Yuletide in Sewickley and completion of a business district database.
The group's $80,000 payment would serve as a base payment for 2015. Funding levels could be decreased or increased up to $10,000.
Three of the metrics are based on quarterly assessments. For instance, if the group reaches 1,300 Facebook “likes” by the end of March, Village Green would be given an additional $500 in 2015. They could earn an additional $500 for each 100 new “likes” added each quarter or see a decrease if those achievements aren't reached.
Markus said she is confident the group can achieve the goals set.
“Every tool we use at Village Green helps us to work toward our mission,” she said. “The newsletter pushes information to over 2,000 people who want that information on a weekly basis. People are using their smartphones everywhere, so using Facebook to tell our story is essential.”
Markus said the group is working toward increasing support it receives from private donors.
“We have said that we will work to decrease our funding from the borough,” she said.
She added that she wasn't certain of a time frame to decrease funding.
“I don't have a magic ball to look into the future to be able to answer that question.”
Council member Tom DeFazio, who was part of a team to develop the metrics, said he approved of the goals set.
With one paid employee — marketing director Alex DeLoia — Markus said much of the work accomplished by the group is volunteer driven.
“Everyone else is a volunteer, including myself,” Markus said. “We pay rent for a physical office space that helps us build relationships in the community, as well as some basic services like accounting and legal advice. All the other money we receive is put right back into marketing the community, running our events and our business development efforts.”
Markus said she thinks the group's efforts pay off when “attendees enjoy the events, the ticket sales increase year over year, we raise funds for great causes and the attendees learn about the offerings in the business district of Sewickley.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.