Concerns over stream stall Sewickley theater project
A lease agreement that would allow Village Theater Company to construct a two-screen movie theater on Sewickley property has been delayed at least until mid-April.
Sewickley Council members said they had wanted to approve a lease Monday night, but concerns stemming from Hoeys Run — a stream that runs under property the nonprofit theater group wants to build on — have delayed final approval, individuals from both sides said.
“Really, it did come down to Hoeys Run,” theater company board member Alex Simakas said. “It's a concern as to what we have, where exactly is it, how deep is it,” he said.
Sewickley Mayor Brian Jeffe said council has remaining concerns. “When they're doing their due diligence, it may determine how they're building the building,” he said.
Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.
Theater organizers have said the two-screen theater would show independent and classic films, and host educational events at a location in the 400 block of Walnut Street.
In September, organizers received a $350,000 grant from the state Gaming Economic Development and Tourism Fund, which brought the group's total to more than $1.2 million.
The nonprofit group is trying to raise $1.5 million.
Sewickley Council members bought the land in July for $910,000. Initial plans called for the theater to be built above a proposed parking garage. Borough leaders in the fall temporarily called off plans to construct a parking garage, citing concerns over how it would be financed.
Borough leaders are awaiting results of a parking study that originally was expected to be publicly released in February.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.