Quaker Valley property owners could face tax increase
Under a proposed final budget, Quaker Valley property owners' taxes could rise for the 2014-15 school year.
School board members last week approved the roughly $43.5 million budget that includes an increase in the property tax rate from 16.93 mills to 17.2 mills.
An owner of a home valued at $258,207, which is the median in the 11 communities that make up the district, would pay about $70 more next year if the board approve the millage increase next month in a final vote.
School leaders say the budget includes a 3.29 percent spending increase, and attribute half of that to mandated increases in the district's Pennsylvania State Employee Retirement System (PSERS) contribution.
“Unfortunately, our biggest budgetary increase – the mandated PSERS contribution – is beyond our control,” Superintendent Joseph Clapper said.
Administrators say the district's total retirement fund contribution is more than $822,000. Board members used $200,000 from a PSERS stabilization fund they created.
“We are extremely fortunate that our school board has been thoughtful and strategic in planning for the PSERS crisis,” Clapper said.
“The benefits of this long-term planning will continue to be evident as the district's pension costs are projected to climb by more than $2 million over the next five years.”
Under Gov. Tom Corbett's proposed state budget, Quaker Valley could receive more than $2 million — or 12 percent of the district's budget, spokeswoman Tina Vojtko said.
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.