Ohio River Trail meeting planned in Beaver County
The first section of a multiphased 41-mile bike and pedestrian trail project is set to undergo construction this spring, an organizer of the Ohio River Trail Council said.
Phase one is set to begin in the Coraopolis-Moon area near the Neville Island Bridge and continue into Coraopolis to the Sewickley Bridge, Ohio River Trail Council President Vincent Troia said.
A meeting is planned for May 1 in the Community College of Beaver County to show those interested updated designs of the proposed trail that is expected to extend from a connection with the Montour Trail in Coraopolis, along the Ohio River into Beaver County and eventually connecting to trails at the Ohio state line, Troia said.
The meeting will offer insight into a 69-mile water trail.
Troia said his goal for the meeting is to “expose the project to the public and give them a chance to ask questions and understand how it will benefit their communities.”
Phase two of the land trail would cross the Sewickley Bridge and connect to bikeways from Glen Osborne to near Old Economy Village in Ambridge, Troia said.
It then would cross back over the Ohio River along the Ambridge-Aliquippa Bridge.
He said he hopes a feasibility study on that portion of the project could be completed next year.
Troia said he's excited to see progress on a venture he helped to start in 2009.
“We're finally getting something on the ground,” he said.
“The trails can offer a great impact to local businesses and to quality of life.”
Bobby Cherry is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.