ShareThis Page

Serafini: When did playing dirty become part of the game?

| Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

When did winning become more important in any sport than the people playing the game?

I know shenanigans like what happened to Andrew McCutchen last weekend happen more frequently than they should, but when did this become OK?

If you weren't watching, didn't hear about it or didn't see the highlight's from Saturday's game against the Diamonbacks, McCutchen was intentionally hit in the back by a 95 mph fastball in the ninth inning. It was in retaliation for Diamondbacks' all-star Paul Goldschmidt fracturing his hand when he was unintentionally hit by a pitch thrown by Ernesto Frieri in the ninth inning of their game the night before.

The pitcher, Randall Delgado, was thrown out of the game, but is that enough?

I'm not picking on baseball; this goes on in pretty much every sport. A few years ago in the NFL, several defensive players for the New Orleans Saints allegedly earned bonuses for injuring opposing players. In June, Uruguay's Luis Suarez apparently bit the shoulder of Italy's Giorgio Chiellini during a World Cup soccer match. And, as a hockey fan, I have watched many goons over the years end the seasons of, or, in some cases the careers of, other players because of dumb choices they've made on the ice.

This isn't limited to the major leagues, either. Last November, a Missouri high school football player was charged with assault after allegedly pulling the helmet off an opposing playing and hitting him in the head with it during a game, giving him a concussion.

I know that most athletes are very passionate about their sports, and I know that it's easy to get caught up in the emotion of the game, but it's never worth hurting someone over.

This is an especially good time for our local high school athletes to remember that as they gear up for fall sports.

Kristina Serafini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-324-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.