ShareThis Page

Privately run parking garage proposed in Sewickley

Bobby Cherry
| Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

First there was a proposal for a publicly run garage.

Now, there's a proposal for a privately run garage.

Frank Zappala and Peter Friday, of Green Street Partners LLC, presented plans on Monday night during Sewickley's council meeting to consider a privately run parking garage on the site of the current Green Street municipal parking lot.

Council members at next month's Committee of the Whole meeting could consider a plan to allow Zappala and Friday to study over a six-month period the possibility of a privately run garage, “so that we can offer or propose a structure and facility that would be in the best interest of the borough, as well as economically feasible,” Zappala said.

With a proposed two-screen movie theater from nonprofit Village Theater Co. and Friday proposing two office buildings under Forbes Trail Development, Zappala said parking will be an issue.

“Other properties are in play that would otherwise be somewhat stymied without the opportunity … for more parking,” he said.

A parking study released earlier this year found that a garage with 300 spaces would be adequate for the borough.

Zappala said they have considered 180 to 200 spaces in a three-floor garage with a fourth floor set aside possibly for development.

“We think we can do it on three levels and still provide a fourth level for another use that is marketable and feasible — another level of parking, potential residential, potential office,” he said.

No cost estimates were publicly discussed.

Zappala said the small size of the property, its configuration and a 45-foot-high building ordinance could limit the facility.

Borough Manager Kevin Flannery said he would meet with Zappala and Friday to draft an agreement for council members to consider.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-324-1408 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.