Baldwin ouncil discusses animal control options
Baldwin officials are seeking a new animal control agency after the company that services the borough and many others in the county had its operating license suspended.
Council members at their voting meeting Tuesday plan to vote to terminate the borough's contract with Triangle Pet, which has serviced the borough for several years.
“I don't want to be associated with a company that currently has been charged with mistreating animals,” council Vice President Michael Stelmasczyk said.
A state dog warden inspected Triangle Pet Services Inc., which services 58 municipalities in the county to pick up stray and dangerous dogs, deer and other wildlife, on Aug. 7 and 17 and found numerous violations, according to state officials. On Sept. 4, Triangle applied to renew its license but was denied by the state. On Sept. 13, the company filed an appeal and a hearing is set for Dec. 4.
One option to find a new service would be for Baldwin to issue a request for proposal, said borough Manager John Barrett. In 2010, the borough issued a request for proposals for animal control services and Triangle Pet was the only company to respond, Barrett said.
Stelmasczyk suggested contacting Pittsburgh officials to see if Baldwin can contract with the city on a “fee for service” basis.
A county dog warden has offered to work with the borough for dog services as officials search for a more permanent company, Barrett said.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review contributed to this report. Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.