Votes add up to a Saccone victory
By Laura Van Wert
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2012, 8:56 p.m.
Republican incumbent Rick Saccone will serve his second consecutive term as state representative in District 39, after beating his challenger, Democrat David Levdansky, by 114 votes.
“I'm very pleased, obviously,” said Saccone, adding that he appreciates all of the communications — emails, phone calls, text messages and conversations — he received from people in support of his re-election.
Levdansky conceeded the race in an email on Nov. 15.
“I am forever grateful for the tremendous support I received in this campaign from a broad array of organizations — the labor movement, the education community, environmental groups and advocates for women and consumer protection,” said Levdansky, adding that one of his biggest regrets is not being able to reform Pennsylvania's campaign finance system.
“While I have long urged people that their vote does matter, and a 114-vote shortfall proves that one vote clearly does matter, I cannot ignore the impact special interest money has on the election process.”
The state representative-elect title for District 39 was up in the air for a week for Saccone, 54, of Elizabeth Township, and Levdansky, 58, also of Elizabeth.
Elections offices in Allegheny and Washington counties had to recount absentee ballots and count provisional ballots because votes for Saccone and Levdansky were too close on Election Day to declare a winner. Unofficial results from both counties totaled 14,486 votes for Saccone and 14,372 for Levdansky.
Levdansky led Allegheny County with a total of 11,411 votes to Saccone's 11,101, said Mark Wolosik, Allegheny County Elections Division Manager. But Saccone edged out a win with 3,385 votes in Washington County, to Levdansky's 2,961, said Larry Spahr, Washington County Elections Director.
Election results will become official upon certification by the election boards in Allegheny and Washington counties.
Saccone said it took hard work to convince District 39 constituents to vote for him. About 76 percent of those living in the district are registered Democrats.
But there still are about 30 absentee and provisional ballots in the district being challenged by the Republican Committee of Allegheny County. However, not enough ballots are being challenged to make a difference in the election.
The Allegheny County Board of Elections will preside over hearings on Friday and Monday for the disputed ballots, Wolosik said. The ballots are being challenged because they were received after the Nov. 2 deadline, although a decision in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas extended the deadline to the closing of the polls on Election Day because of Hurricane Sandy.
This is the second time Saccone and Levdansky faced off in a neck-and-neck race. Levdansky was the 39th District representative for 25 years before Saccone ousted him two years ago by a 151-vote margin.
The 39th District includes Jefferson Hills.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins stave off Ducks’ shooting barrage to win in shootout
- Trade to Penguins caps frenetic period for winger Stempniak
- Penguins notebook: Maatta leaves lasting impression with Selanne
- Steelers restructure Brown’s contract to become salary cap compliant
- Greensburg woman accused of assaulting nurse in Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital
- Pirates seek to tap Alvarez’s remaining upside
- Gorman: Pitt should be happy with Dixon
- Web of surveillance videos helps ensnare suspect in East Liberty slayings
- Man dies in overnight Butler house fire
- Loss to Pitt propelled Clemson
- Minorities crucial to filling Marcellus shale gas drilling jobs