ShareThis Page

Exit interviews help seniors take first step in real world

| Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 1:56 p.m.

The curvature of Baldwin High School's main hallway was lined with young men and women in suits and dresses, most of them leaning over pieces of paper, memorizing the answers that they hope will charm the group waiting inside each classroom.

This is no ordinary assignment - this is what they've been preparing for all year. This is the assignment that filled a binder, included research and community service, the one that ultimately decides if they will be a Class of 2012 Baldwin High School graduate.

"It's almost as if they're interviewing for a job," said Adam Foote, a social studies teacher who coordinated the interviews. "I think there are some very nervous students waiting in the hall right now."

About 350 seniors attended school on May 24 - a day the rest of the district's students were off because of the state primary - to attend personal exit interviews. The students each sat before a panel of four to six teachers and administrators from every school in the district and answered questions about their time at Baldwin.

Previous to the interviews, students had to complete 15 hours of community service, a research paper and a portfolio that included a resumé, references, a tentative financial budget, career research and self-reflection essays, Foote said. This work started at the beginning of the school year, and combined with the senior interview, decides if the student will graduate.

Last year, only one or two students failed the assignment, Foote said.

"The goal is to not to keep students from graduating, but to make them ready for life," Foote said.

Each interview took between 15 and 30 minutes, after which the panel members discuss the student, score the interview out of 100 points and then give the student feedback.

Baldwin High School administrators started the senior exit interviews about three or four years ago. This is the second year district-wide teachers were invited to join the panels, Foote said.

Foote and the rest of the social studies teachers worked with the students throughout the year to keep them on task with their portfolio work, he said.

"It would be unfair to graduate them without these skills," Foote said. "I don't know if they truly see the benefit yet."

Zach DeNardo, 18, of Whitehall, was one of the 10:30 a.m. interviewees for the panel that consisted of Diana Golden, a kindergarten teacher at McAnnulty Elementary School; Jennifer Petrilla, a first-grade teacher at Paynter Elementary School; Sarah Fiorill, a guidance counselor at Baldwin High School; Eric Saternos, a sixth-grade teacher at J.E. Harrison Middle School; and John Wilkinson, assistant superintendent.

Coincidentally, Golden was DeNardo's kindergarten teacher and Saternos had him as a student as a sixth-grader.

"Some things never change," said Golden, during the interview. "He was always hard-working."

DeNardo was asked to name three words that would describe him, his future career goals, what he learned from his community service, his weaknesses and the most important lesson he learned in high school, among other questions.

"You did a fabulous job," said Patrilla, adding that DeNardo made great eye contact and answered the questions well.

DeNardo will attend Duquesne University this fall and hopes to pursue a career in pharmacy, he said.

Afterward, DeNardo said he was pleased with his interview.

"I thought it was very beneficial and it will help me out in future interviews," DeNardo said. "It makes me feel proud and I hope they feel the same way ... I'm happy it's over."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.