Meeting set to detail Route 51/88 work
A project is moving forward to improve and repair an intersection that some South Hills officials are calling the "worst bottleneck on Route 51."
Increased efficiency, improved safety and reduced travel time are needed at the Route 51/Route 88 intersection, said Greg Jones, executive director of Economic Development South, a nonprofit working to improve business development in Baldwin, Brentwood and Whitehall boroughs and Pittsburgh neighborhoods of Carrick and Overbrook.
"It's providing suburban living with urban accessibility," Jones said.
A PennDOT project, undertaken as bridge repair work at the Route 51/Route 88 intersections, likely could achieve that, officials have said.
A public meeting will be held July 25 from 5 to 7 p.m. at St. Norbert's Church hall, 2413 St. Norbert St., Pittsburgh, where Pennsylvania Department of Transportation officials will present final design and project details and schedule information for the state Route 51⁄88 bridge and intersection improvement project, said spokesman Jim Struzzi. Plans and graphics will be on display.
"Essentially, it's updated plans," he said.
A brief presentation will be held at 5:30 p.m.
PennDOT officials unveiled the plans for a $14 million improvement project in the Overbrook section of Pittsburgh and Whitehall Borough nearly two years ago.
At the time, they said the project would include the replacement of six bridges and ultimately eliminate left turns from Route 51.
The estimated $15 to 20 million project is scheduled for construction in early 2013 and will take two years to complete.
The project also is set to improve travel time for vehicles at the intersection, officials have said, something that is welcome and wanted by local officials and residents alike.
"Even if it's just a few minutes off of your average commute, it's going to be a big thing," Jones said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bags, food can’t be brought into district facilities under new rules
- Pleasant Hills sets ordinance banning farm animals
- Baldwin-Whitehall officials aim to stop ‘revolving door’
- Caste Village festival boasts throwback rides
- Jefferson Hills’ fall fest in 5th year
- Baldwin-Whitehall assistant superintendent lands new contract
- Brentwood council seems likely to vote for EMS provider
- Investigator begins review of Brentwood police department
- Brentwood, Baldwin police consolidation talks to continue
- Pleasant Hills officials adopt farm animal ban