Whitehall Public Library lobby renovations a success
As Corinne Grubb entered the Whitehall Public Library, she noticed something was missing under her feet.
The deteriorating bricks that she and her family, neighbors and community members once had purchased to help support the library were gone from the floor. Instead, a replica of each hung as a tribute on the wall above.
“I'm very happy they kept them,” said Grubb, 53, a resident of Whitehall since 1984 and frequent library visitor, as she pointed out familiar names on the wall — including those of her family. “I think it's great because you can see it more up there.”
Constant foot traffic left the bricks, used as a library fundraiser in the late 1990s, broken and illegible.
A renovation project to the library's lobby, which included transforming the bricks into wall art, was completed in the last few weeks. The upgrades caused intermittent closures at the facility for two weeks during construction, staffers said.
The main impetus of the project was to replace the bricks in the flood and once again make them a focal point of the lobby, said library director Paula Kelly.
“People spent a lot of money to have this tribute,” she said.
The renovations — divided into two projects costing $24,500 and $7,500 and completed by Koffler Building Co. — were funded through estate gifts, Kelly said.
Changes also included a new look in the lobby, created by Virginia Weida Designs.
“It looks very elegant, yet very welcoming,” Kelly said.
Resident responses to the changes have been positive, Kelly said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.