Refrigerator from Baldwin Borough deemed state's oldest
The old refrigerator Richard Linnert's aunt left in the basement when he bought her Baldwin Borough home in 1998 turned out to be worth more than he thought.
The 1937 Frigidaire that Linnert, 68, once used to store beer and soda pop was named “Pennsylvania's Oldest Refrigerator” on Tuesday. That distinction earned Linnert $1,250 in Sears gift cards.
Linnert's fridge beat out 18,360 others that were recycled between April and August through a program co-sponsored by Duquesne Light, Sears, JACO Environmental and other electric utilities across the state to replace inefficient appliances.
The program, which judged only refrigerators donated for recycling, is an attempt to reduce energy consumption. It pays the owners $35 for their old refrigerators and freezers. The companies remove the inefficient appliances to be recycled.
Linnert said he would have been happy with the $35. His refrigerator outlived its usefulness and he moved his favorite beverages to a refrigerator on the first floor of his home for easier access some time ago.
“I just didn't need it anymore,” Linnert said Tuesday, as he received his bonus Sears gift cards. He said he was surprised to learn his fridge was 75 years old.
Instead of buying a new refrigerator with his winnings, Linnert plans to purchase a flat-screen television and a new phone.
Linnert said he plans to watch his energy usage, in part by switching to the energy-efficient “swirly kind” of light bulbs throughout his home.
“I think everybody should do something,” he said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.