Brentwood councilman given chance to perform community service
The preliminary hearing will be continued in 30 days for a Brentwood councilman charged with disorderly conduct after he was accused of threatening another councilman in September.
Magisterial district Judge John Bova gave Councilman Pasquale “Pat” Carnevale, 74, the option today, Thursday, during the 30-day period to complete 16 hours of community service at a food pantry.
Carnevale declined to comment.
Carnevale was charged in October after threatening to strike David Wenzel, Brentwood Borough Council president, on Sept. 11, after an executive session. It wasn't clear why the men were arguing.
Wenzel, 66, filed a charge against Carnevale after the council meeting.
Police spent more than a month reviewing video and audio from the meeting, and received a recommendation from the Allegheny County District Attorney's office to charge Carnevale, police Chief Robert Butelli said in October.
Council members started arguing during an executive session.
Solicitor Thomas Ayoob said Carnevale threatened Wenzel and advised that Carnevale be escorted out of council chambers. No officer was called to the room.
Carnevale also was cited in 2010 with disorderly conduct for entering Brentwood's swimming pool without showing identification and then refusing to leave the water upon police orders. The charge was withdrawn in January 2011, according to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas court records.
Carnevale was elected to council in November 2011.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.