Baldwin-Whitehall School District secretary retires after 22 years
Mary Ann Kraus, secretary to the superintendent in the Baldwin-Whitehall School District, retired in December after 22 years of full-time employment.
Kraus, 65, of Whitehall, will stay on as a part-time employee to the Baldwin-Whitehall School Board as the group's secretary, allowing her more time to be with family and friends.
“I'm excited,” Kraus said. “I can spend more of my time traveling.”
Kraus said she plans to spend much of that time traveling to New Jersey and Virginia to visit her children and grandchildren. A trip to Europe also is a possibility, she said.
Kraus started working in the Baldwin-Whitehall School District in August 1990 as a computer paraprofessional at Baldwin High School, then spent five years in curriculum before becoming former Superintendent Charles Faust's secretary in 1998, she said.
“I've met a lot of good people and I've had a lot of good bosses,” Kraus said.
Kraus will stay on as the school board secretary, which she estimates will be about five days of work a month at four hours a day.
Throughout the years, she said she enjoyed learning how the school board functions and conducts business.
“I still have a big investment in our school district,” she said.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.