Jefferson Hills property tax rate still open for debate
By Laura Van Wert
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013, 8:56 p.m.
Jefferson Hills property owners should know later this month if the millage for borough property taxes will go up this year.
Borough council was scheduled to discuss the millage at the Jan. 9 meeting, after the South Hills Record's deadline. Most likely there will be a special meeting later in the month to vote on the millage, said Andrew McCreery, the borough's business manager.
“That's something that they're going to decide,” McCreery said. “There's still a lot left that needs to be decided.”
Council approved the $12.93 million 2013 budget on Dec. 10 with the intention of setting the millage once officials received the final certified property values from the Allegheny County reassessment.
McCreery estimated the 2013 millage rate while also anticipating that it would be tweaked when he constructed the budget, he said.
“The numbers were relatively close,” he said.
Senior Common Pleas Court Judge R. Stanton Wettick Jr. issued an order extending the deadline for municipalities to adopt their 2013 budgets until Jan. 31, because of the delayed reassessment numbers.
About 31 percent of Jefferson Hills‘ assessed properties increased in value.
Also complicating setting the borough's millage rate are more than 300 parcels of land that are in appeals because of the county's reassessment values of the properties, McCreery said.
There is a $28 million difference between the old and reassessed values, most of which are commercial properties, still waiting for appeal hearings with the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, McCreery said. He is working with other borough officials to estimate where to set the final millage rate.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Baldwin Township charter school plans for enrollment boost
- Baldwin-Whitehall board fires transportation manager
- Vocal resident banned from all Baldwin-Whitehall district property
- Stabbing tragedy prompts districts to re-examine what they would do